Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:46

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
New theory proposes time has three dimensions, with space as a secondary effect - Phys.org
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Exclusive: Clean energy investment hits new highs and shows no sign of slowing - TechCrunch
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Does Trump have the authority to order U.S. strikes on Iran? - PBS
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Gucci Owner Picks Auto Executive for One of Global Luxury’s Top Jobs - WSJ
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
My Wife and I Are Never Splitting AirPods Again Thanks to This iPhone Trick - CNET
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why do wives cheat on their loyal husbands?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.